NSAC Members 2019 2020

NSAC Members for 2019 - 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013-12 | 2011 |2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2004-5 | 2004 | 2003 | 2001-2 | 2000-1

DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee 2020 Membership List
Mei Bai Accelerator Operations GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Darnstadt Germany	Yury Kolomensky Department of Physics University of California Berkeley, California
Joseph Carlson Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545	Suzanne Lapi (2018 SNMMI ex-Officio) Department of Radiology University of Alabama Birmingham, Alabama 35294
Jozef Dudek Physics Department College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia 23185	Zein-Eddine Meziani Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois 60439
Olga Evdokimov Department of Physics University of Illinois Chicago, Illinois 60607	Sofia Quaglioni Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94551
Renee Fatemi University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40506	Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Bonnie Fleming Yale University New Haven, Connecticut 06520	Jenifer Shafer (2019 ACS ex-Officio) Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado 80401
Geoffrey Greene Physics Division University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996	Artemis Spyrou National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824
David Hertzog (Chair) Department of Physics University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195	Rebecca Surman University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556
Tanja Horn The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064	Boleslaw Wyslouch Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Robert Janssens (2019 APS ex-Officio) University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599	Sherry Yennello Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843
Silvia Jurisson Department of Chemistry University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri 65211

Highlights

View all Highlights

Graph comparing a neutron star with a quark-matter core vs. a nuclear matter core in mass vs. radius. The quark matter core star would have less mass and radius than the nuclear matter core, as stars with smaller radii and more mass are too unstable.

New Clues on Twin Neutron Stars and the Extreme Physics Inside

Scientists have new insights into factors that determine how twin neutron stars—stars with the same mass but different sizes and compositions—can coexist.

Illustration of alpha fusion processes in stars and reactions used on Earth floating above an image of the Earth

Predictive Theory Revises Understanding of Alpha Processes During the Big Bang and in Massive Stars

Theoretical calculations enable more accurate determination of reaction rates for modelling primordial lithium-6 abundance and massive stars’ lifecycle.

sub nav