Scoring Guides for the Challenge Competition
Track I: In-Depth Proposal – Propose how AI technologies could address a community challenge with detailed analysis and justification.
Scoring Guide
Criteria |
Description |
Points |
Problem Definition and Community Relevance |
The team clearly identifies a real community challenge and, explains why it's important, and demonstrates insight into the needs and context of the community. |
15 |
Relevance to the President and his Administration1 |
The team’s project is relevant to the priorities, values, or vision of the President and his Administration. |
10 |
AI Application Plan2 |
The team thoroughly explains how AI technologies could be applied responsibly to address the challenge and includes a detailed description of the proposed AI methods and tools and how the methods and tools would function in practice. |
20 |
Research and Accuracy |
The proposal is backed by research into both the community challenge and AI technologies. Sources are relevant and credible. |
20 |
Process and Development |
The team clearly outlines the development process of the proposal, including planning steps, iterations, and challenges overcome. |
15 |
Originality and Creativity |
The team presents an innovative, thoughtful, and unique approach to solving the challenge. |
10 |
Use and Validation of AI Concepts |
Team’s use of AI concepts is sound, well-reasoned, and clearly justified. AI methods and tools mentioned are relevant and realistic. |
10 |
Total: |
100 points |
1Score is used as the first tie break; 2Score is used as the second tie break
Track II: Technical Solution and Implementation – Build a functional AI-based solution for a real community problem and demonstrate its application.
Scoring Guide
Criteria |
Description |
Points |
Problem Identification and Impact |
The team clearly articulates a local or community problem and explains how the solution can improve outcomes. |
10 |
Relevance to the President and his Administration1 |
The team’s project is relevant to the priorities, values, or vision of the President and his Administration. |
10 |
Technical Implementation2 |
The team demonstrates technical understanding and functionality of the AI solution and includes models, tools, or platforms used. |
20 |
Process and Development |
The team describes the creation and testing of the solution, including iteration cycles, setbacks, and improvements. |
15 |
Use of AI and Validation |
The team clearly explains how AI is integrated into the solution and includes testing, accuracy evaluation, or user feedback if applicable. |
15 |
Originality and Creativity |
The solution shows novel thinking, unique and responsible application of AI, and a creative adaptation to community context. |
10 |
Supporting Narrative (at least words) |
The team explains the purpose, development journey, AI technology used, community impact, and future enhancements. |
10 |
Presentation/Media Quality |
Supplementary media (demo video, app walkthrough, poster, etc.) is clear, engaging, and enhances understanding of the solution. |
10 |
Total: |
100 points |
1Score is used as the first tie break; 2Score is used as the second tie break
Educator Track III: Innovative AI Teaching Approach – Design and present an instructional method for teaching AI.
Scoring Rubric
Criteria |
Description |
Points |
Instructional Innovation |
Educators introduce a unique or transformative approach to teaching AI concepts or using AI tools in K–12 education and demonstrate innovative thinking and potential to change classroom practice. |
20 |
Clarity and Accuracy of AI Content2 |
AI content is technically accurate, age-appropriate, and clearly explained. Educators effectively simplify complex AI ideas for the intended student audience. |
20 |
Process and Planning |
Educators clearly explain the development process, including instructional design, planning steps, intended outcomes, and any challenges overcome. |
15 |
Student Engagement and Relevance1 |
Educators have an approach that is engaging and relevant to students' lives or learning needs and shows how students will be motivated to learn or apply AI meaningfully and responsibly. |
15 |
Use and Validation of AI Tools |
Educators demonstrate how AI tools or techniques enhance teaching or learning in a way not easily possible without AI technologies and include rationale or evidence (student reactions, pilot results, etc.). |
15 |
Presentation (Video or Digital Demo) |
The final presentation (video, screencast, interactive slide deck, etc.) is polished, engaging, and clearly communicates the instructional idea and its impact. |
15 |
Total: |
100 points |
1Score is used as the first tie break; 2Score is used as the second tie break
Educator Track III: Using AI Tools to Transform Education – Explore how AI tools can assist in creating transformative teaching and learning experiences.
Scoring Rubric
Criteria |
Description |
Points |
Instructional Innovation |
Educators introduce a unique or transformative approach to teaching and learning using AI tools and demonstrate innovative thinking and the potential to improve the teaching profession or classroom experiences. |
20 |
Clarity and Accuracy of AI Content2 |
AI content is technically accurate and clearly explained. Educators effectively use AI tools to improve the education field in ways not possible without the AI tools. |
20 |
Process and Planning |
Educators clearly explain the development process, including the design, planning steps, intended outcomes, and any challenges overcome. |
15 |
Educator Engagement and Relevance1 |
Educators have an approach that will engaging and relevant to other educators and their students or classrooms and shows how other educators will be motivated to learn or apply the AI tool meaningfully and responsibly. |
15 |
Use and Validation of AI Tools |
Educators demonstrate how AI tools or techniques enhance educators’ teaching style, classroom management, or communications with families in a way not easily possible without AI technologies and include rationale or evidence |
15 |
Presentation (Video or Digital Demo) |
The final presentation (video, screencast, interactive slide deck, etc.) is polished, engaging, and clearly communicates the instructional idea and its impact. |
15 |
Total: |
100 points |